Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Forms
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Store
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Community
Discussion
RDM & MRDM Appeals Study
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DiscountDan" data-source="post: 10342" data-attributes="member: 973"><p>RDM/MRDM Appeal Study</p><p>Discount Dan</p><p>User on Atomic</p><p></p><p>Abstract: </p><p>In this paper Its hoped to understand why some appeals fail, specifically RDM and MRDM appeals. There is opinion and bias which is unavoidable in such a rough and ready review of appeals. If your on here your perspective is your choice, and if your actions bring you shame consider that maybe its the action thats the problem. There is good in all people, we all have our moments, let it be a learning experience. </p><p></p><p>Thesis: </p><p>If someone uses fallacies in appeals, then it will most likely fail, because fallacies can be refuted.</p><p></p><p>Result of study:</p><p>Skullking RDM Ignorance</p><p>Zalgus MRDM ignorance</p><p>DerpestRainbow MRDM Ignorance</p><p>Sullivan MRDM moving the goal post</p><p>Spooky_cookies RDM burden of proof</p><p>StixyWixy RDM Slippery Slope</p><p>JosephThugish RDM Ad Hominem/Burden of proof</p><p>Iamblamb7890 RDM Ignorance</p><p>Jordann RDM Burden of proof</p><p>Dragonslayer59 RDM Ad Hominem</p><p>w00dy2005 MRDM Tu Quoque </p><p>Cvbesz MRDM Bandwagon</p><p>lolersMickJagers MRDM Cherry Picking</p><p>Ooga_BoOgA MRDM Ignorance</p><p>Breojones1 MRDM Appeal to authority</p><p>Kidwithastick MRDM Ad Hominem</p><p>Dayz MRDM Ignorance</p><p>Ryynex RDM Ad Hominem/burden of proof</p><p>Cucumber MRDM Ignorance</p><p>Ninjamuffin MRDM Bandwagon/ignorance</p><p>iBoxForUSPostal1 MRDM Ignorance</p><p>Jasonman21 MRDM Ignorance</p><p>alsuck RDM Appeal to authority</p><p>BigmanBBQsauce MRDM Bandwagon</p><p>1ntellectual RDM tu Quoque/cherry picking</p><p>Smokeyg5897 RDM Ignorance</p><p>Swagger RDM Bandwagon</p><p>Dirt10 MRDM ignorance/burden of proof</p><p>NOTHACKING314 MRDM Appeal to authority</p><p>Striker MRDM Bandwagon</p><p>Roneaza RDM Ignorance</p><p>Crispy_Bacon9 RDM Ignorance</p><p>ichen6 MRDM Bandwagon/ad hominem</p><p>Omybeast MRDM Appeal to authority</p><p>Bread RDM Appeal to authority</p><p>Carszy RDM cherry picking/burden of proof</p><p>Combo MRDM Burden of proof/ad hominem</p><p>FoL101 RDM Ignorance</p><p>TonyLinguini RDM Ad Hominem/cherry picking/burden of proof</p><p>dadnevercameback MRDM Ignorance</p><p>CrisPBacon MRDM Ignorance</p><p>peep-_- MRDM Burden of proof</p><p>ItzDark MRDM Ignorance</p><p>Hypothermia MRDM Ignorance/ad hominem</p><p>JustinPain MRDM Ignorance</p><p>Kwolfgang551 MRDM Appeal to authority/Ad hominem</p><p>Nyengs MRDN Bandwagon</p><p>DouBlin RDM Ignorance</p><p>Idontcare123 MRDM ad hominem/ignorance</p><p>randeezy MRDM Appeal to authority</p><p></p><p>Results:</p><p>Ignorance seems to be a very common fallacy used in appeals, which is weird since to appeal you have to go on the forms where the rules are. Ad hominem seems to be the worst approach as attacking staff verbally seems to not go anywhere. Bandwagon is what it always has been and can be poked so full of holes one could mistake it for a strainer. The appeal to authority is often interesting as they try and grasp at straws and loose connections at best. The burden of proof argument is probably the worst one because it does not exactly endear you to the admins, by exclaiming your inability to provide the evidence that your ban was unwarranted, often demanding more evidence from admins gets more evidence from admins, and usually it's pretty detrimental to your case. Cherry picking always seems to be an odd idea for people to do with facts however some still try the issue is that admins often have logs, so when cherry picking one should be warry of omitting ones actions against the amoral truth of logs.</p><p></p><p>Conclusion:</p><p>The use of fallacies in arguments in general does not get positive results. </p><p></p><p>See chart attached for explanation of types of fallacies.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://is2.4chan.org/pol/1493993226750m.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DiscountDan, post: 10342, member: 973"] RDM/MRDM Appeal Study Discount Dan User on Atomic Abstract: In this paper Its hoped to understand why some appeals fail, specifically RDM and MRDM appeals. There is opinion and bias which is unavoidable in such a rough and ready review of appeals. If your on here your perspective is your choice, and if your actions bring you shame consider that maybe its the action thats the problem. There is good in all people, we all have our moments, let it be a learning experience. Thesis: If someone uses fallacies in appeals, then it will most likely fail, because fallacies can be refuted. Result of study: Skullking RDM Ignorance Zalgus MRDM ignorance DerpestRainbow MRDM Ignorance Sullivan MRDM moving the goal post Spooky_cookies RDM burden of proof StixyWixy RDM Slippery Slope JosephThugish RDM Ad Hominem/Burden of proof Iamblamb7890 RDM Ignorance Jordann RDM Burden of proof Dragonslayer59 RDM Ad Hominem w00dy2005 MRDM Tu Quoque Cvbesz MRDM Bandwagon lolersMickJagers MRDM Cherry Picking Ooga_BoOgA MRDM Ignorance Breojones1 MRDM Appeal to authority Kidwithastick MRDM Ad Hominem Dayz MRDM Ignorance Ryynex RDM Ad Hominem/burden of proof Cucumber MRDM Ignorance Ninjamuffin MRDM Bandwagon/ignorance iBoxForUSPostal1 MRDM Ignorance Jasonman21 MRDM Ignorance alsuck RDM Appeal to authority BigmanBBQsauce MRDM Bandwagon 1ntellectual RDM tu Quoque/cherry picking Smokeyg5897 RDM Ignorance Swagger RDM Bandwagon Dirt10 MRDM ignorance/burden of proof NOTHACKING314 MRDM Appeal to authority Striker MRDM Bandwagon Roneaza RDM Ignorance Crispy_Bacon9 RDM Ignorance ichen6 MRDM Bandwagon/ad hominem Omybeast MRDM Appeal to authority Bread RDM Appeal to authority Carszy RDM cherry picking/burden of proof Combo MRDM Burden of proof/ad hominem FoL101 RDM Ignorance TonyLinguini RDM Ad Hominem/cherry picking/burden of proof dadnevercameback MRDM Ignorance CrisPBacon MRDM Ignorance peep-_- MRDM Burden of proof ItzDark MRDM Ignorance Hypothermia MRDM Ignorance/ad hominem JustinPain MRDM Ignorance Kwolfgang551 MRDM Appeal to authority/Ad hominem Nyengs MRDN Bandwagon DouBlin RDM Ignorance Idontcare123 MRDM ad hominem/ignorance randeezy MRDM Appeal to authority Results: Ignorance seems to be a very common fallacy used in appeals, which is weird since to appeal you have to go on the forms where the rules are. Ad hominem seems to be the worst approach as attacking staff verbally seems to not go anywhere. Bandwagon is what it always has been and can be poked so full of holes one could mistake it for a strainer. The appeal to authority is often interesting as they try and grasp at straws and loose connections at best. The burden of proof argument is probably the worst one because it does not exactly endear you to the admins, by exclaiming your inability to provide the evidence that your ban was unwarranted, often demanding more evidence from admins gets more evidence from admins, and usually it's pretty detrimental to your case. Cherry picking always seems to be an odd idea for people to do with facts however some still try the issue is that admins often have logs, so when cherry picking one should be warry of omitting ones actions against the amoral truth of logs. Conclusion: The use of fallacies in arguments in general does not get positive results. See chart attached for explanation of types of fallacies. [IMG]https://is2.4chan.org/pol/1493993226750m.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…